After reading the discussions of Bill Kerr, Stephen Downs, and Karl Kapp, I would have to say that I agree with Kerr’s “isms". I see the potential for all the diverse learning theories in education. I don’t think that how we learn can be specifically explained by one theory alone. If one learning theory could explain how we learn, I don’t believe that there would be so many beliefs and arguments available.
I do agree that we learn through cognitivism in the respect of problem solving and creativity. However, I defiantly see some aspects of behaviorism in the respect to stimulus and response. We have to keep an open mind when it comes to these learning theories. It is my opinion that the way we learn will never be explained by one theory alone. Even with a class of ten students, it is hard to find three students who learn in the same way. As stated by Kerr (2007) in reference to –isms, “They evolve, they listen to criticism and move on.”
Kerr, B. (2007, January 1). _isms as filter, not blinker [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://billkerr2.blogspot.com/2007/01/isms-as-filter-not-blinker.html
Kerr, B. (2007, January 1). _isms as filter, not blinker [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://billkerr2.blogspot.com/2007/01/isms-as-filter-not-blinker.html
Kapp, K. (2007, January 2). Out and about: Discussion on educational schools of thought [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://www.kaplaneduneering.com/kappnotes/index.php/2007/01/out-and-about-discussion-on-educational/
Responded to Waymyers and Karen Wondergem for module 2.
Responded to Waymyers and Karen Wondergem for module 2.